только для медицинских специалистов
Консультант врача. Электронная медицинская библиотека

Консультант врача

Электронная медицинская библиотека

Доступ к библиотеке Версия для слабовидящих
Раздел 12 / 17
Страница 1 / 2

Список литературы

  1. Hashim Hashim, Christopher R.J. Woodhouse Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS 11 (2012) 25–32 doi:10.1016/j.eursup.2012.01.004
  2. Maizels M, Stephens FD. Valves of the ureter as a cause of primary obstruction of the ureter: anatomic, embryologic and clinical aspects. J Urol 1980;123:742–7.
  3. Hosgor M, Karaca I, Ulukus C, et al. Structural changes of smooth muscle in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:1632–6.
  4. Lowe FC, Marshall FF. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Urology 1984;23:331–5.
  5. Adey GS, Vargas SO, Retik AB, et al. Fibroepithelial polyps causing ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. J Urol 2003;169: 1834–6.
  6. Lallas CD, Pak RW, Pagnani C, et al. The minimally invasive management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in horseshoe kidneys. World J Urol 2011;29:91–5.
  7. Сизонов В.В. Диагностика обструкции пиелоуретерального сегмента у детей. Вестник урологии. 2016г. №4 с 56-120
  8. Сapello S. A., Kogan B. A., Giorgi L. J. et al. Prenatal ultrasound has led to earlier detection and repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol. 2005; 174:1425–1428
  9. Сohen B, Goldman SM, Kopilnick M, Khurana AV, Salik JO. Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: its occurrence in 3 members of a single family. J Urol 1978;120:361–4.
  10. Pediatric urology guidelines, ЕSРU. 2015; 41-44.; Pediatric urology guidelines, European association of urology. 2018; 49-53
  11. Thomas DFM. Upper tract obstruction. In: Thomas DFM, Duffy PG, Rickwood AMK, editors. Essentials of paediatric urology. Ed. 2. London, UK: Informa Healthcare; 2008. P. 73–92.
  12. Nonomura K., Yamashita Т., Kanagawa K. et al. Management and outcome of antenatally diagnosed hydronephrosis // Int. J. Urol. — 1994 — Vol. 1 — P. 121—128.
  13. Лопаткин Н.А. Руководство по урологии // Москва: Медицина, 1998. — Т. 2. — С. 190.
  14. Onen A. An alternative grading system to refine the criteria for severity of hydronephrosis and optimal treatment guidelines in neonates with primary UPJ-type hydronephrosis. J. Pediatr. Urol. 2007; 3 (3): 200-205. Doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2006.08.002
  15. Fernbach SK, Maizels M, Conway JJ. Ultrasound grading of hydronephrosis: Introduction to the system used by the Society for Fetal Urology. Pediatr Radiol 1993; 23: 478-480
  16. Grignon A, Filion R, Filiatrault D, Robitaille P, Homsy Y, Boutin H, et al. Urinary tract dilatation in utero: classifica- tion and clinical applications. Radiology. 1986;160: 645-7
  17. Дерюгина Л.А. Антенатальная диагностика врожденных заболеваний мочевыводящей системы и обоснование тактики ведения детей в постнатальном периоде. Дис. Д-ра мед. Наук. — М, 2008.
  18. Nguyen, H.T., Herndon, C.D., Cooper C., et al. The Society for Fetal Urology consensus statement on the evaluation and management of antenatal hydronephrosis. J Pediatr Urol. 2010; 6: 212–231. Doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.02.205.
  19. Wojciechowska J, Dembowski J, Zdrojowy R, Szydełko T. Hydronephrosis in the course of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: An underestimated problem? Current opinions on the pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2017 Aug;26(5):857-864. Doi: 10.17219/acem/59509.
  20. Глыбочко П.В., Аляев Ю.Г. Гидронефроз. М: ГЕОТАР-Медиа, 2011г, 32 с.
  21. Урология, национальное руководство/ под редакцией акад. РАМН Н.А. Лопаткина. Москва, «ГЭОТАР-Медиа», 2009г с. 370.
  22. Григорян В.А. Хирургическое лечение гидронефроза: Дис. Д-ра мед. Наук. — М, 1998.
  23. Heinlen JE, Manatt CS, Bright BC, Kropp BP, Campbell JB, Frimberger D. Operative versus nonoperative management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Urology 2009; 73:521–5
  24. Ebel KD. Uroradiology in the fetus and newborn: diagnosis and follow-up of congenital obstruction of the urinary tract. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28(8):630–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9716640
  25. Ismaili K, Avni FE, Hall M. Results of systematic voiding cystourethrography in infants with antenatally diagnosed renal pelvis dilatation. J Pediatr. 2002; 141:21–4
  26. Ward VL. Patient dose reduction during voiding cystourethrography. Pediatr Radiol. 2006; 36:168-72
  27. Herndon C.D., McKenna P.H., Kolon T.F. et al. A multicenter outcomes analysis of patients with neonatal reflux presenting with prenatal hydronephrosis. J Urol. 1999; 162: 1203-1208. DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)68134-5
  28. Capolicchio J.P., Braga L.H., Szymanski K.M. Canadian Urological Association/Pediatric Urologists of Canada guidelines on the investigation and management of antenatally detected hydronephrosis. Can Urol Assoc J. 2018;12(4):85-92. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.5094
  29. Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Neururer R, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced color Doppler imaging (CDI), computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the detection of crossing vessels in patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction UPJO). Eur Urol.2008 ; 53:12 5 4 –126 0
  30. Васильев, А.Ю. Лучевая диагностика в педиатрии. / А.Ю. Васильев. ГЭОТАР- Медиа. 2009. – С. 217.
  31. Talner LB. Specific disorders of the urinary tract. In: Clinical Urography, Pollack HM, Dyer RB, editors. By: WB Saunders: Philadelphia. 2000
  32. Ramaswamy K, Marien T, Mass A, Stifelman M, Shah O. Simplified approach to estimating renal function based on computerized tomography. Can J Urol. 2013; 20:6833–6839.
  33. Каситериди И.Г. Сравнительная оценка современных методов исследования при гидронефрозе. Дис. К-та мед. Наук. — М., 2005.
  34. Khaira H.S., Platt J.F., Cohan R.H. et al. Helical computed tomography for identification of crossing vessels in ureteropelvic junction obstruction-comparison with operative findings. Urology. 2003; 62 (1); 35-39.
  35. Krzemien, G. Importance of different imaging methods in diagnosis of significant urodynamically uretropelvic junction obstruction in children with congenital hydronephrosis. Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2008; 24(4): 41- 45.
  36. Thukral, B. B. Problems and preferences in pediatric imaging. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2015; 25 (4):359-364.
  37. Towbin R., Baskin K. Pediatric Interventional Radiology. Cambridge University Press. 2015; 493
  38. Esmaeili M, Ghane F, Alamdaran A. Comparison Between Diuretic Urography (IVP) and Diuretic Renography for Diagnosis of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children. Iran J Pediatr. 2016 Feb;26(1):e4293. Doi: 10.5812/ijp.4293. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
  39. Taylor AT, Brandon DC, de Palma D. et al. SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Diuretic Renal Scintigraphy in Adults With Suspected Upper Urinary Tract Obstruction. Semin Nucl Med. 2018 Jul;48(4):377-390. Doi: 10.1053/j.s
  40. Prigent A., Cosgriff P., Gates G.F. et al. Consensus report on quality control of quantitative measurements of renal function obtained from renogram: International Consensus Committee from the Scientific Committee of Radionuclides in Nephrourology. Semin. Nucl. Med. 1999; 91:46–59.
  41. Lee J.N., Kang J.K., Jeong S.Y. et al. Predictive value of cortical transit time on MAG3 for surgery in antenatally detected unilateral hydronephrosis caused by ureteropelvic junction stenosis. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(1):55.e1-55.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.08.009
  42. O´ Reilly P., Aurell M., Britton K. et al. Consensus on diuresis renography for investigating the dilated upper urinary tract. J. Nucl. Med. 1996; 37 (11):1872-76.

  1. Gordon I., Piepsz A., Sixt R. Auspices of Paediatric Committee of European Association of Nuclear Medicine. Guidelines for standard and diuretic renogram in children. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2011; 38 (6):1175- 88. DOI 10.1007/s00259-011-1811-36
  2. Rao NP, Srirangam SJ, Preminger GM. Nuclear Medicine Investigations. Urological Tests in Clinical Practice. London: Springer-Verlag; 2007. P. 132-62.
  3. Majd M, Bar-Sever Z, Santos AI, De Palma D. The SNMMI and EANM Procedural Guidelines for Diuresis Renography in Infants and Children. J Nucl Med. 2018;59(10):1636-1640. Doi: 10.2967/jnumed.118.215921
  4. Piepsz A, Sixt R., Gordon I. Performing renography in children with antenatally detected pelvi- ureteric junction stenosis: errors, pitfalls, controversies. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2010; 54(4):350-62
  5. Павлов, А.Ю., Сабирзянова З.Р., Фомин Д.К. и др. Современные возможности лучевой диагностики пороков развития мочевыделительной системы у детей. Российский электронный журнал радиологии. 2011; 1 (2): 135-136.
  6. Mendichovszky I. Nuclear Medicine in Pediatric Nephro-Urology: An Overview. Semin Nucl Med. 2017; 47 (3): 204-228.
  7. Ritchie G. Wilkinson A.G., Prescott R.J. Comparison of differential renal function using technetium-99m mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG3) and technetium-99m dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renography in a paediatric population. Ped. Radiol. 2008; 38(8):857-62. Doi: 10.1007/s00247-008-0908-8.
  8. Яцык С.П., Зубовский Г.А., Фомин Д.К. Способ оценки жизнеспособности почечной паренхимы. Пат. № 2270605, РФ. Бюл. 2006; № 6
  9. Громов, А.И. Лучевая диагностика и терапия в урологии. Национальное руководство. / А. И. Громов, В.М. Буйлов, С.К. Терновой. ГЭОТАР-Медиа. – 2011. – С. 544.
  10. Cerwinka, W. H., Grattan-Smith J.D., Kirsch A.J. Magnetic resonance urography in pediatric urology. J Pediatr Urol. 2008; 4(1): 74-82.
  11. Arlen, A.M. Magnetic resonance urography for diagnosis of pediatric ureteral stricture / A. M. Arlen // J Pediatr Urol. – 2014. – Т. 10. – No5. – С. 792-798.
  12. Ritter, L. Significance of MR angiography in the diagnosis of aberrant renal arteries as the cause of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. Rofo. 2015; 187(1): 42-48.
  13. Sharma A. Comparison of intravenous urography and magnetic resonance urography in preoperative evaluation of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2016; 21 (4):169-174.

  1. Hwang, S.I. Effectiveness of MR urography in the evaluation of kidney which failed to opacify during excretory urography: comparison with ultrasonography. Korean J Radiol. 2000; 1(3):152-158.
  2. Johnston RB, Porter C. The Whitaker test. Urology journal. 2014;11(3):17 27–17 3 0.
  3. Ringert R.H., Kallerhoff M. Leitlinie zur Diagnostik der Harntransportstörungenin der Kinderurologie // Urologe A. — 1998. — Vol. 37. — P. 573–574.
  4. Еникеев М.Э. Гидронефроз: современные технологии в диагностике и лечении. Дис. Д- ра мед. Наук. — М., 2008.
  5. Lee RS, Cendron M, Kinnamon DD, et al. Antenatal hydronephrosis as a predictor of postnatal outcome: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2006; 118:586-93. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2006-0120
  6. Alberti C. Congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: physiopathology, decoupling of tout court pelvic dilatation-obstruction semantic connection, biomarkers to predict renal damage evolution. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2012; 16(2):213-9.
  7. Belman A.B. A perspective on vesicoureteral reflux // Urol. Clin. North. Am. — 1995. — Vol. 22. — P. 139–150.
  8. Szydelko T, Kasprzak J, Apoznanski W, et al. Comparison of dismembered and nondismembered Y-V laparoscopic pyeloplasty in patients with primary hydronephrosis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A .2010 ; 20 (1):7–12 .
  9. Szydelko T, Kasprzak J, Lewandowski J, Apoznanski W, Dembowski J. Dismembered laparoscopic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty versus nondismembered laparoscopic Y-V pyeloplasty in the treatment of patients with primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A prospective study. Journal of Endourology/Endourological Society. 2012 ; 2 6 ( 9 ) :116 5 – 117 0 .
  10. Arumainayagam N, Minervini A, Davenport K, et al. Antegrade versus retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol. 2008;22:671–674.
  11. Shalhav AL, Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA, Gofrit ON, Gerber GS, Zorn KC. Adult stentless laparoscopic pyeloplasty. JSLS. 2007;11: 8–13.
  12. Giri SK, Murphy D, Costello AJ, Moon DA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty outcomes of elderly patients. J Endourol. 2011;25:251–256.
  13. Metzelder ML, Schier F, Petersen C, Truss M, Ure BM. Laparoscopic transabdominal pyeloplasty in children is feasible irrespective of age. J Urol. 2006 ;175: 688–691.
  14. Autorino R, Eden C, El-Ghoneimi A, et al. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2014; 65:430–452.

  1. Shoma AM, El Nahas AR, Bazeed MA. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A prospective randomized comparison between the transperitoneal approach and retroperitoneoscopy. J Urol. 2007; 178:2020–2024; discussion 2024.
  2. Wu Y, Dong Q, Han P, Liu L, Wang L, Wei Q. Meta-analysis of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approaches of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A .2012; 22(7):658–662.
  3. Uberoi J, Disick GI, Munver R. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: Update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty. BJU Int. 2009; 10 4:1722–1729.
  4. Braga LH, Pace K, DeMaria J, Lorenzo AJ. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic- assisted versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Effect on operative time, length of hospital stay, post-operative complications, and success rate. Eur Urol. 2009; 56:848–857.
  5. Chang SJ, Hsu CK, Hsieh CH, Yang SS. Comparing the efficacy and safety between robotic- assisted versus open pyeloplasty in children: A systemic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol.2015;33(11):1855 –1865.
  6. Lucas SM, Sundaram CP, Wolf JS, et al. Factors that impact the outcome of minimally invasive pyeloplasty: Results of the Multi-institutional Laparoscopic and Robotic Pyeloplasty Collaborative Group. J Urol.2012;187: 522–527.
  7. Manikandan R, Saad A, Bhatt RI, Neilson D. Minimally invasive surgery for pelviureteral junction obstruction in adults: A critical review of the options. Urology.2005;65:422–432.
  8. Lam JS, Cooper KL, Greene TD, Gupta M. Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: Antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy. Urology.2003; 61:1107- 1111.
  9. Ning Xu, Shao-Hao Chen, Xue-Yi Xue et al. Comparison of Retrograde Balloon Dilatation and Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty for Treatment of Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction: Results of a 2-Year Follow-Up. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0152463. Journal. Pone.0152463.
  10. Angulo JM, Parente A, Romero RM. Et al. Management of ureteropelvic juncti on obstruction with high-pressureballoon dilatation: long-term outcome in 50 children under 18 months of age. Urology. 2013;82(5):1138-43. Urology.2013.04.072.
  11. Зоркин С.Н., Губарев В.И., Сальников В.Ю. и др. Эндоскопическая баллонная дилатация высокого давления как метод лечения обструкции лоханочно- мочеточникового сегмента у детей. Вестник урологии. 2017; 5(2):5-11. DOI:10.21886/2308-6424-2017-5-2-5-11.

Для продолжения работы требуется вход / регистрация