81. Малькевич В.Т. Несостоятельность пищеводного анастомоза и некроз эзофаготрансплантата при хирургическом лечении рака пищевода // Онкологический журнал. 2010. Т. 4, № 4. С. 115–128.
82. Dowson H.M., Strauss D., Mason R. The acute management and surgical reconstruction following failed esophagectomy in malignant disease of the esophagus // Dis. Esophagus. 2007. Vol. 20. P. 135–140.
83. Кавайкин А.Г. Современное состояние проблемы несостоятельности пищеводных анастомозов после операций по поводу рака пищевода и пищеводно-желудочного перехода // Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова. 2007. Т. 166. № 5. С. 107–110.
84. Черноусов А.Ф., Поликарпов С.А., Черноусов Ф.А. Хирургия рака желудка. Москва : ИздАТ, 2004. С. 173–174, 210–214.
85. Черноусов А.Ф., Богопольский П.М., Курбанов Ф.С. Хирургия пищевода: Руководство для врачей. Москва : Медицина, 2000. 352 с.
86. Kaiser L.R., Thompson S.K., Jamieson G.G. Operative thoracic surgery. 2018. 462 p.
87. Бебезов С.И., Бурмистров М.В., Сигал Е.И. и др. Ретроспективный анализ частоты несостоятельности эзофагогастроанастомоза после экстирпации пищевода // Практическая медицина. 2016. № 9. С. 108–111.
88. Guo J., Chu X., Liu Y. et al. Choice of therapeutic strategies in intrathoracic anastomotic leak following esophagectomy // World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2014. № 12. P. 402–408.
89. Klink C.D., Binnebösel M., Otto J. et al. Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis after resection of esophageal cancer: a matched pair analysis of 72 patients in a single center study // World J. Surg. Oncol. 2012. Vol. 10. P. 159.
90. Markar S.R., Arya S., Karthikesalingam A., Hanna G.B. Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis // Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2013. Vol. 20, N 13. P. 4274–4281.
91. Wright C.D., Zeitels S.M. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injuries after esophagectomy // Thorac. Surg. Clin. 2006. Vol. 16, N 1. P. 23–33.
92. Biere S.S., Maas K.W., Cuesta M.A., van der Peet D.L. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Dig. Surg. 2011. Vol. 28. P. 29–35.
93. Babar K., Jarral O.A., Athanasiou T., Zacharakis E. Should oesophagectomy be performed with cervical or intrathoracic anastomosis? // Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery. 2012. Vol. 14. P. 821–827.
94. Shah D.R., Martinez S.R., Canter R.J. et al. Comparative morbidity and mortality from cervical or thoracic esophageal anastomoses // J. Surg. Oncol. 2013. Vol. 108, N 7. P. 472–476.
95. Kassis E.S., Kosinski A.S., Ross P.Jr. et al. Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2013. Vol. 96, N 6. P. 1919–1926.
96. Orringer M.B., Sloan H. Substernal gastric bypass of excluded thoracic esophagus for palliation of esophageal carcinoma // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1975. Vol. 70. P. 836–851.
97. Yamasaki M., Miyata H., Yasuda T. et al. Impact of the route of reconstruction on post-operative morbidity and malnutrition after esophagectomy: a multicenter cohort study // World J. Surg. 2015. Vol. 39, N 2. P. 433–440.
98. Feng M.X., Wang Q., Jiang W. et al. Comparison of retrosternal and posterior mediastinal gastric tube reconstruction after three-phase esophagectomy // Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010. Vol. 13, N 1. P. 33–35.
99. Zheng Y.Z., Dai S.Q., Li W. et al. Comparison between different reconstruction routes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma // World J. Gastroenterol. 2012. Vol. 39, N 18. P. 5616–5621.
100. Hu H., Ye T., Tan D. et al. Is anterior route a shorter choice for esophageal reconstruction? A comparative anatomic study // European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. 2011. Vol. 40. P. 1466–1469.
101. Lerut T.E., Lanschot J.J.B. Chronic symptoms after subtotal or partial oesophagectomy: diagnosis and treatment // Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 2004. Vol. 18, № 5. P. 901–915.
102. Wang W.-P., Gao Q., Wang K.N. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture // World Journal of Surgery. 2013. Vol. 37, № 5. P. 1043–1050.
103. Давыдов М.И., Неред С.Н., Кузьмичев В.А. и др. Проблемы эзофагопластики при раке пищевода // Вестник РОНЦ им. Н.Н. Блохина РАМН. 1990. Т. 1, № 1. С. 48–52.
104. Liu B.W., Liu Y., Liu J.R., Feng Z.X. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses in surgeries of gastrointestinal tumors based on clinical practice of China // World J. Surg. Oncol. 2014. Vol. 12, N 1. P. 292.
105. Okuyama M., Motoyama S., Suzuki H. et al. Hand-sewn cervical anastomosis versus stapled intrathoracic anastomosis after esophagectomy for middle or lower thoracic esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled study // Surg. Today. 2007. Vol. 37. P. 947–952.
106. Blackmon S.H., Correa A.M., Wynn B. et al. Propensity-matched analysis of three techniques for intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007. Vol. 83, N 5. P. 1805–1813.
107. Price T.N., Nichols F.C., Harmsen W.S. et al. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2013. Vol. 95, N 4. P. 1154–1160.
108. Luechakiettisak P., Kasetsunthorn S. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled in esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study // J. Med. Assoc. Thai. 2008. Vol. 91. P. 681–685.
109. Zhang Y.S., Gao B.R., Wang H.J. Comparison of anastomotic leakage and stricture formation following layered and stapler oesophagogastric anastomosis for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial // J. Int. Med. Res. 2010. Vol. 38, N 1. P. 227–233.