61. Bodner J., Wykypiel H., Wetscher G. et al. First experiences with the da Vinci™ operating robot in thoracic surgery // Eur. J.Cardiothorac. Surg. 2004. Vol. 25, N 5. P. 844–851.
62. Watson T.J. Robotic esophagectomy: is it an advance and what is the future? // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2008. Vol. 85. P. 757–759.
63. Hernandez J.M., Dimou F., Weber J. Defining the learning curve for robotic-assisted esophagogastrectomy // J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2013. Vol. 17. P. 1346–1351.
64. Barbash G.I., Glied S.A. New technology and health care costs the case of robot-assisted surgery // N. Engl. J. Med. 2010. Vol. 363. P. 701–704.
65. Pennathur A., Zhang J., Chen H., Luketich J.D. The “Best Operation” for Esophageal Cancer? // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2010. Vol. 89, N 6. Р. 2163–2167.
66. Verhage R.J., Hazebroek E.J., Boone J., Van Hillegersberg R. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature // Minerva Chir. 2009. Vol. 64, N 2. Р. 135–146.
67. Biere S.S., Cuesta M.A., van der Peet D.L. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis // Minerva Chir. 2009. Vol. 64, N 2. Р. 121–133.
68. Nagpal K., Ahmed K., Vats A. et al. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis // Surg.Endosc. 2010. Vol. 24, N 7. P. 1621–1629.
69. Watanabe M., Baba Y., Nagai Y., Baba H. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review // Surg. Today. 2013. Vol. 43, N 3.Р. 237–244.
70. Sihag S., Wright C.D., Wain J.C. et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2012. Vol. 42, N 3. Р. 430–437.
71. Meng F., Li Y., Ma H. et al. Comparison of outcomes of open and minimally invasive esophagectomy in 183 patients with cancer // J. Thorac. Dis. 2014. Vol. 6, N 9. Р. 1218–1224.
72. Gemmill E.H., McCulloch P. Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer // Br. J. Surg. 2007. Vol. 94, N 12. Р. 1461–1467.
73. Dantoc M.M., Cox M.R., Eslick G.D. Does minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) provide for comparable oncologic outcomes to open techniques? A systematic review // J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2012. Vol. 16, N 3. Р. 486–494.
74. Hanna G.B., Arya S., Markar R.S. Variation in the Standard of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer Systematic Review // Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2012. Vol. 24. P. 176–187.
75. Zhou C., Ma G., Li X. et al. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy effective for preventing anastomotic leakages after esophagectomy for cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis // World J. Surg. Oncol. 2015. Vol. 13, N 1. P. 269.
76. Biere S.S., van Berge Henegouwen M.I., Maas K.W.et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial // Lancet. 2012. Vol. 379. Р. 1887–1892.
77. D’Amico Th.A., McKeown. Esophagogastrectomy // Journal of Thoracic. Disease. 2014. Vol. 6, N 3. P. 322–324.
78. Mamidanna R. Short-term outcomes following open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer in England: a population-based national study // Annals of Surgery. 2012. Vol. 255, N 2. P. 197–203.
79. Smithers B.M. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy // Annals of Surgery. 2007. Vol. 245, N 2. P. 232–240.
80. Daiko H., Fujita T. Laparoscopic assisted versus open gastric pull-up following thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a cohort study // International Journal of Surgery. 2015. Vol. 19. P. 61–66.
81. Briez N., Piessen G., Prudhomme M. et al. Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications // Br. J. Surg. 2012. Vol. 99, N 11. Р. 1547–1553.
82. Piessen G., Mariette C., Markar S. Abstract 615O_PR: Hybrid Minimally Invasive vs. Open Esophagectomy for Patients with Esophageal Cancer: Long-Term Outcomes of a Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Phase III Controlled Trial, the MIRO Trial. http://www.esmo.org/Press-Office/Press-Releases/MIRO-Trial-3-year-Outcomes- Favour-Laparoscopic-Surgery-for-Oesophageal-Cancer. Vol. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00937456.
83. Smithers B.M. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy // Annals of Surgery. 2007. Vol. 245, N 2. P. 232–240.
84. Kuwano H., Nishimura Y., Oyama T. et al. Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus April 2012 // Esophagus. 2014. Vol. 12. P. 1–30.
85. Lordick F., Mariette C., Haustermans K. et al. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up // Annals of Oncology. 2016. Vol. 27, N 5. P. 50–57.
86. Ajani J.A., D'Amico Th.A. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers // NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology:Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers. 2016.
87. Роман Л.Д., Карачун А.М., Шостка К.Г. и др. Методы реконструкции пищевода // Практическая онкология. 2003. Т. 4, № 2. С. 99–108.
88. Карачун А.М., Левченко Е.В., Пелипась Ю.В. и др. Первый опыт миниинвазивных вмешательств в хирургии рака пищевода // Вопросы онкологии. 2013. Т. 59, № 5. С. 642–644.
89. Дворецкий С.Ю., Левченко Е.В., Карачун А.М. и др. Опыт использования эндовидеотехнологий в хирургическом лечении рака пищевода // Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова. 2014. Т. 173, № 6. С. 54–59.