1. Finks J.F., Osborne N.H., Birkmeyer J.D. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery // N. Engl. J. Med. 2011. Vol. 364. P. 2128–2137.
2. Markar S.R., Karthikesalingam A., Thrumurthy S. et al. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000–2011 // J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2012. Vol. 16. P. 1055–1063.
3. Wright C.D., Kucharczuk J.C., O’Brien S.M. et al. Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustmentmodel // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2009. Vol. 137. P. 587–595.
4. Low D.E., Kuppusamy M.K., Alderson D. et al. Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy // Ann. Surg. 2019. Vol. 269, N 2. P. 291–298.
5. Малькевич В.Т., Ильин И.А., Баранов А.Ю. Хирургия пищевода. Минск : Национальная библиотека Беларуси, 2017. 240 с.
6. Metzger R., Bollschweiler E., Vallbohmer D. et al. High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality? // Dis. Esophagus. 2004. Vol. 17, N 4. P. 310–314.
7. Birkmeyer J.D., Siewers A.E., Finlayson E.V. et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States // N. Engl. J. Med. 2002. Vol. 346. P. 1128–1137.
8. Тазалов В.А. Классификация хирургических осложнений // Журнал новый хирургический архив. 2004. Т. 2, № 4. C. 27–39.
9. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. The dindo-clavien classification of surgical complications // Ann. Surg. 2004. Vol. 244. P. 931–937.
10. Blencowe N.S., Strong S., McNair A.G. et al. Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: a systematic review // Ann. Surg. 2012. Vol. 255. P. 658–666.
11. Low D.E., Alderson D., Cecconello I. et al. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) // Ann. Surg. 2015. Vol. 262. P. 286–294.
12. Paul S., Bueno R. SectionVI: complications following esophagectomy: early detection, treatment, and prevention // Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2003. Vol. 15. P. 210–215.
13. Patil P.K., Patel S.G., Mistry R.C. et al. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak — a retrospective study of predisposing factors // J. Surg. Oncol. 1992. Vol. 49, N 3. P. 163–167.
14. Ryan C.E., Paniccia A., Meguid R.A. et al. Transthoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: current trends // Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 281–290.
15. Mboumi I.W., Reddy S., Lidor A.O. Complications after esophagectomy // Surg. Clin. North. Am. 2019. Vol. 99, N 3. P. 501–510.
16. Orringer M.B., Marshall B., Iannettoni M.D. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements // Ann. Surg. 1999. Vol. 230, N 3. P. 392–400.
17. Urschel J.D. Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review // Am. J. Surg. 1995. Vol. 169. P. 634–640.
18. Doty J.R., Salazar J.D., Forastiere A.A. et al. Postesophagectomy morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay after preoperative chemoradiation therapy // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002. Vol. 74, N 1. P. 227–231.
19. Zacherl J., Sendler A., Stein H.J. et al. Current status of neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus // World J. Surg. 2003. Vol. 27, N 9. P. 1067–1074.
20. Горбашко А.И., Рогозов Л.И., Федоткин Д.В. Топография основных сосудов желудка и их значение в хирургии // Вестник хирургии. 1964. Т. 92, № 3. с. 49–55.
21. Liebermann-Meffert D.M., Meier R., Siewert J.R. Vascular anatomy of the gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1992. Vol. 54. P. 1110–1115.
22. Goan Y.G., Chang H.C., Hsu H.K., Chou Y.P. An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2007. Vol. 31, N 3. P. 536–544.
23. Juloori A., Tucker S.L., Komaki R. et al. Influence of preoperative radiation field on postoperative leak rates in esophageal cancer patients after trimodality therapy // J. Thorac. Oncol. 2014. Vol. 9, N 4. P. 534–540.
24. Кавайкин А.Г. Современное состояние проблемы несостоятельности пищеводных анастомозов после операций по поводу рака пищевода и пищеводно-желудочного перехода // Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова. 2007. Т. 166, № 5. С. 107–110.
25. FarranTeixidor L., LlopTalaveron J., Galan Guzman M. et al. Surgical outcomes of esophageal cancer resection since the development of an oesophagogastric tumour board // Cir. Esp. 2013. Vol. 91, N 8. P. 517–523.
26. Lerut T., Coosemans W., Decker G. et al. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy // Dig. Surg. 2002. Vol. 19. P. 92–98.
27. Бурмистров М.В., Сигал Е.И., Бебезов С.И. и др. Возможные варианты решения проблемы несостоятельности пищеводно-желудочного анастомоза // Вестник хирургической гастроэнтерологии. 2016. № 3. С. 9.
28. Lerut T., Coosemans W., De Leyn P. et al. Optimizing treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction // Surg. Oncol. Clin. North. Am. 2001. Vol. 10. P. 863–884.
29. Мирошников Б.И., Горбунов Г.Н., Иванов А.П. Пластика пищевода. Санкт-Петербург : ЭЛБИ-СПб, 2012. 368 с.
30. Bruce J., Krukowski H., Al-Khairy G. et al. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery // Br. J. Surg. 2001. Vol. 88. P. 1157–1168.
31. Peel A.L., Taylor E.W. Proposed definitions for the audit of postoperative infection: A discussion paper. Surgical infection study group // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1991. Vol. 73. P. 385–388.
32. Peng J., Cai J., Niu Z.X. et al. Early enteral nutrition compared with parenteral nutrition for esophageal cancer patients after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis // Dis. Esophagus. 2016. Vol. 29, N. 4. P. 333–341.