Список литературы к главе 12

1. Finks J.F., Osborne N.H., Birkmeyer J.D. Trends in hospital volume and operative mortality for high-risk surgery // N. Engl. J. Med. 2011. Vol. 364. P. 2128–2137.

2. Markar S.R., Karthikesalingam A., Thrumurthy S. et al. Volume-outcome relationship in surgery for esophageal malignancy: systematic review and meta-analysis 2000–2011 // J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2012. Vol. 16. P. 1055–1063.

3. Wright C.D., Kucharczuk J.C., O’Brien S.M. et al. Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustmentmodel // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2009. Vol. 137. P. 587–595.

4. Low D.E., Kuppusamy M.K., Alderson D. et al. Benchmarking complications associated with esophagectomy // Ann. Surg. 2019. Vol. 269, N 2. P. 291–298.

5. Малькевич В.Т., Ильин И.А., Баранов А.Ю. Хирургия пищевода. Минск : Национальная библиотека Беларуси, 2017. 240 с.

6. Metzger R., Bollschweiler E., Vallbohmer D. et al. High volume centers for esophagectomy: what is the number needed to achieve low postoperative mortality? // Dis. Esophagus. 2004. Vol. 17, N 4. P. 310–314.

7. Birkmeyer J.D., Siewers A.E., Finlayson E.V. et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States // N. Engl. J. Med. 2002. Vol. 346. P. 1128–1137.

8. Тазалов В.А. Классификация хирургических осложнений // Журнал новый хирургический архив. 2004. Т. 2, № 4. C. 27–39.

9. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. The dindo-clavien classification of surgical complications // Ann. Surg. 2004. Vol. 244. P. 931–937.

10. Blencowe N.S., Strong S., McNair A.G. et al. Reporting of short-term clinical outcomes after esophagectomy: a systematic review // Ann. Surg. 2012. Vol. 255. P. 658–666.

11. Low D.E., Alderson D., Cecconello I. et al. International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) // Ann. Surg. 2015. Vol. 262. P. 286–294.

12. Paul S., Bueno R. SectionVI: complications following esophagectomy: early detection, treatment, and prevention // Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2003. Vol. 15. P. 210–215.

13. Patil P.K., Patel S.G., Mistry R.C. et al. Cancer of the esophagus: esophagogastric anastomotic leak — a retrospective study of predisposing factors // J. Surg. Oncol. 1992. Vol. 49, N 3. P. 163–167.

14. Ryan C.E., Paniccia A., Meguid R.A. et al. Transthoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: current trends // Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 281–290.

15. Mboumi I.W., Reddy S., Lidor A.O. Complications after esophagectomy // Surg. Clin. North. Am. 2019. Vol. 99, N 3. P. 501–510.

16. Orringer M.B., Marshall B., Iannettoni M.D. Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements // Ann. Surg. 1999. Vol. 230, N 3. P. 392–400.

17. Urschel J.D. Esophagogastrostomy anastomotic leaks complicating esophagectomy: a review // Am. J. Surg. 1995. Vol. 169. P. 634–640.

18. Doty J.R., Salazar J.D., Forastiere A.A. et al. Postesophagectomy morbidity, mortality, and length of hospital stay after preoperative chemoradiation therapy // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002. Vol. 74, N 1. P. 227–231.

19. Zacherl J., Sendler A., Stein H.J. et al. Current status of neoadjuvant therapy for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus // World J. Surg. 2003. Vol. 27, N 9. P. 1067–1074.

20. Горбашко А.И., Рогозов Л.И., Федоткин Д.В. Топография основных сосудов желудка и их значение в хирургии // Вестник хирургии. 1964. Т. 92, № 3. с. 49–55.

21. Liebermann-Meffert D.M., Meier R., Siewert J.R. Vascular anatomy of the gastric tube used for esophageal reconstruction // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1992. Vol. 54. P. 1110–1115.

22. Goan Y.G., Chang H.C., Hsu H.K., Chou Y.P. An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma // Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2007. Vol. 31, N 3. P. 536–544.

23. Juloori A., Tucker S.L., Komaki R. et al. Influence of preoperative radiation field on postoperative leak rates in esophageal cancer patients after trimodality therapy // J. Thorac. Oncol. 2014. Vol. 9, N 4. P. 534–540.

24. Кавайкин А.Г. Современное состояние проблемы несостоятельности пищеводных анастомозов после операций по поводу рака пищевода и пищеводно-желудочного перехода // Вестник хирургии им. И.И. Грекова. 2007. Т. 166, № 5. С. 107–110.

25. FarranTeixidor L., LlopTalaveron J., Galan Guzman M. et al. Surgical outcomes of esophageal cancer resection since the development of an oesophagogastric tumour board // Cir. Esp. 2013. Vol. 91, N 8. P. 517–523.

26. Lerut T., Coosemans W., Decker G. et al. Anastomotic complications after esophagectomy // Dig. Surg. 2002. Vol. 19. P. 92–98.

27. Бурмистров М.В., Сигал Е.И., Бебезов С.И. и др. Возможные варианты решения проблемы несостоятельности пищеводно-желудочного анастомоза // Вестник хирургической гастроэнтерологии. 2016. № 3. С. 9.

28. Lerut T., Coosemans W., De Leyn P. et al. Optimizing treatment of carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction // Surg. Oncol. Clin. North. Am. 2001. Vol. 10. P. 863–884.

29. Мирошников Б.И., Горбунов Г.Н., Иванов А.П. Пластика пищевода. Санкт-Петербург : ЭЛБИ-СПб, 2012. 368 с.

30. Bruce J., Krukowski H., Al-Khairy G. et al. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery // Br. J. Surg. 2001. Vol. 88. P. 1157–1168.

31. Peel A.L., Taylor E.W. Proposed definitions for the audit of postoperative infection: A discussion paper. Surgical infection study group // Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1991. Vol. 73. P. 385–388.

32. Peng J., Cai J., Niu Z.X. et al. Early enteral nutrition compared with parenteral nutrition for esophageal cancer patients after esophagectomy: a meta-analysis // Dis. Esophagus. 2016. Vol. 29, N. 4. P. 333–341.

33. Ye H.Y., Huang W.Z., Wu Y.M. et al. Personalized management of anastomotic leak after surgery for esophageal carcinoma // Chin. Med. Sci. J. 2012. Vol. 27. P. 35–40.

34. Guo J., Chu X., Liu Y. et al. Choice of therapeutic strategies in intrathoracic anastomotic leak following esophagectomy // World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2014. Vol. 12. P. 402–408.

35. Mboumi I.W., Reddy S., Lidor A.O. Complications after esophagectomy // Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2019. Vol. 99. P. 501–510.

36. Raman V., Moodie K.L., Ofoche O.O. et al. Endoscopy after esophagectomy: safety demonstrated in a porcine model // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2017. Vol. 154, N 3. P. 1152–1158.

37. Gonzalez J.M., Servajean C., Aider B. et al. Efficacy of the endoscopic management of postoperative fistulas of leakages after esophageal surgery for cancer: a retrospective series // Surgical Endoscopy. 2016. Vol. 30, N 11. P. 4895–4903.

38. Dasari B.V., Neely D., Kennedy A. et al. The role of esophageal stents in the management of esophageal anastomotic leaks and benign esophageal perforations // Ann. Surg. 2014. Vol. 259, N 5. P. 852–860.

39. Watkins J.R., Farivar A.S. Endoluminal therapies for esophageal perforations and leaks // Thorac. Surg. Clin. 2018. Vol. 28, N 4. P. 541–554.

40. Kauer W.K.H., Stein H.J., Dittler H.-J. et al. Stent implantation as a treatment option in patients with thoracic anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy // Surgical. Endoscopy. 2008. Vol. 22, N 1. P. 50–53.

41. Lee K.M., Shin S.J., Hwang J.C. et al. Proximal-releasing stent insertion under transnasal endoscopic guidance in patients with postoperative esophageal leakage // Gastrointestinal. Endoscopy. 2010. Vol. 72, N 1. P. 180–185.

42. Tuebergen D., Rijcken E., Mennigen R. et al. Treatment of thoracic esophageal anastomotic leaks and esophageal perforations with endoluminal stents: efficacy and current limitations // J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2008. Vol. 12, N 7. P. 1168–1176.

43. Wedemeyer J., Schneider A., Manns M., Jackobs S. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of upper intestinal anastomotic leaks // Gastrointest. Endosc. 2008. Vol. 67, N 4. P. 708–711.

44. Brangewitz M., Voigtländer T., Helfritz F.A. et al. Endoscopic closure of esophageal intrathoracic leaks: stent versus endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure, a retrospective analysis // Endoscopy. 2013. Vol. 45, N 6. P. 433–438.

45. Schniewind B., Schafmayer C., Voehrs G. et al. Endoscopic endoluminal vacuum therapy is superior to other regimens in managing anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy: a comparative retrospective study // Surg. Endosc. 2013. Vol. 27, N 10. P. 3883–3890.

46. Crestanello J.A., Deschamps C., Cassivi S.D. et al. Selective management of intrathoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy // J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2005. Vol. 129, N 2. P. 254–260.

47. Ryan C.E., Paniccia A., Meguid R.A., McCarter M.D. Transthoracic anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: current trends // Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2017. Vol. 24. P. 281–290.

48. Lainas P., Fuks D., Gaujoux S. et al. Preoperative imaging and prediction of oesophageal conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy for cancer // Br. J. Surg. 2017. Vol. 104, N 10. P. 1346–1354.

49. Dickinson K.J., Blackmon S.H. Management of conduit necrosis following esophagectomy // Thorac. Surg. Clin. 2015. Vol. 25, N 4. P. 461–470.

50. Oesophago-gastric anastomosis study group on behalf of the west midlands research collaborative. International variation in surgical practices in units performing oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: a unit survey from the oesophago-gastric anastomosis audit (OGAA) // World J. Surg. 2019. Vol. 43. P. 2874–2884.

51. Паршин В.Д., Седова Т.Н., Самохин А.Я. Хирургия грудного протока. Москва : ГЭОТАР-Медиа, 2016. 200 с.

52. Johnson O.W., Chick J.F.B., Chauhan N.R. et al. The thoracic duct: clinical importance, anatomic variation, imaging, and embolization // Eur. Radiol. 2016. Vol. 26. P. 2482–2493.

53. Weijs T.J., Ruurda J.P., Broekhuizen M.E. et al. Outcome of a step-up treatment strategy for chyle leakage after esophagectomy // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2017. Vol. 104. P. 477–484.

54. Naoya Yoshida, Hideo Baba. Risk factors for chylothorax after esophagectomy // J. Thorac. Dis. 2019. Vol. 11, N 3. P. 196–197.

55. Mashhadi M.R., Bagheri R., Abdollahi A. et al. The effect of neoadjuvant therapy on early complications of esophageal // Cancer Surgery. 2015. Vol. 27. P. 279–284.

56. Yang H., Liu H., Chen Y. et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): a phase III multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial // J. Clin. Oncol. 2018. Vol. 36. P. 2796–2803.

57. Давыдов М.И., Стилиди И.С. Рак пищевода. Москва : Издательская группа РОНЦ, Практическая медицина, 2007. 392 с.

58. Lin Y., Li Z., Li G. et al. Selective en masse ligation of the thoracic duct to prevent chyle leak after esophagectomy // Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2017. Vol. 103. P. 1802–1807.