Список литературы к главе 8

50. College National Des Gynecologues Et Obstetriciens Francai. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique Le diabete gestationnel. December 10, 2010. 680 р. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.biopoleantilles.fr/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/DIABETE-GESTATIONNEL-CNGOF-DEC-2010.pdf.

51. Ehrenthal D.B., Jiang X., Strobino D.M. Labor induction and the risk of a cesarean delivery among nulliparous women at term // Obstet. Gynecol. 2010. Vol. 116, N 1. P. 35–42. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e10c5c.

52. Thorsell M., Lyrenäs S., Andolf E., Kaijser M. Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women // Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2011. Vol. 90, N 10. P. 1094–1099. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01213.x.

53. Boulvain M., Marcoux S., Bureau M., Fortier M., Fraser W. Risks of induction of labour in uncomplicated term pregnancies // Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2001. Vol. 15, N 2. P. 131–138. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2001.00337.x.

54. Piper J.M. Lung maturation in diabetes in pregnancy: if and when to test // Semin. Perinatol. 2002. Vol. 26, N 3. P. 206–209. DOI: 10.1053/sper.2002.33969.

55. Stock S.J., Ferguson E., Duffy A., Ford I., Chalmers J., Norman J.E. Outcomes of elective induction of labour compared with expectant management: population based study // BMJ. 2012. Vol. 344. P. e2838. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e2838.

56. Wood S., Cooper S., Ross S. Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes // BJOG. 2014. Vol. 121, N 6. P. 674–685; discussion 685. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.12328.

57. Mishanina E., Rogozinska E., Thatthi T., Uddin-Khan R., Khan K.S., Meads C. Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis // CMAJ. 2014. Vol. 186, N 9. P. 665–673. DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.130925.

58. Gülmezoglu A.M., Crowther C.A., Middleton P., Heatley E. Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012. Vol. 6, N 6. P. CD004945. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004945.pub3. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2018. N 5. P. CD004945. PMID: 22696345; PMCID: PMC4065650.

59. Levy A.L., Gonzalez J.L., Rappaport V.J., Curet L.B., Rayburn W.F. Effect of labor induction on cesarean section rates in diabetic pregnancies // J. Reprod. Med. 2002. Vol. 47, N 11. P. 931–932. PMID: 12497683.

60. Boulvain M., Stan C., Irion O. Elective delivery in diabetic pregnant women // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2001. Vol. 2. P. CD001997. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001997.

61. Sacks D.A., Sacks A. Induction of labor versus conservative management of pregnant diabetic women // J. Matern Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2002. Vol. 12, N 6. P. 438–441. DOI: 10.1080/jmf.12.6.438.441.

62. Niu B., Lee V.R., Cheng Y.W., Frias A.E., Nicholson J.M., Caughey A.B. What is the optimal gestational age for women with gestational diabetes type A1 to deliver? // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014. Vol. 211, N 4. P. 418.e1–418.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.06.015.

63. Melamed N., Ray J.G., Geary M., Bedard D., Yang C., Sprague A. et al. Induction of labor before 40 weeks is associated with lower rate of cesarean delivery in women with gestational diabetes mellitus // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016. Vol. 214, N 3. P. 364.e1–364.e8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.021.

64. Witkop C.T., Neale D., Wilson L.M., Bass E.B., Nicholson W.K. Active compared with expectant delivery management in women with gestational diabetes: a systematic review // Obstet. Gynecol. 2009. Vol. 113, N 1. P. 206–217. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31818db36f.

65. Alberico S., Erenbourg A., Hod M., Yogev Y., Hadar E., Neri F. et al. Immediate delivery or expectant management in gestational diabetes at term: the GINEXMAL randomised controlled trial // BJOG. 2017. Vol. 124, N 4. P. 669–677. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14389.

66. Kjos S.L., Henry O.A., Montoro M., Buchanan T.A., Mestman J.H. Insulin-requiring diabetes in pregnancy: a randomized trial of active induction of labor and expectant management // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993. Vol. 169, N 3. P. 611–615. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90631-r.

67. Lurie S., Insler V., Hagay Z.J. Induction of labor at 38 to 39 weeks of gestation reduces the incidence of shoulder dystocia in gestational diabetic patients class A2 // Am. J. Perinatol. 1996. Vol. 13, N 5. P. 293–296. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-994344.

68. Feig D.S., Razzaq A., Sykora K., Hux J.E., Anderson G.M. Trends in deliveries, prenatal care, and obstetrical complications in women with pregestational diabetes: a population-based study in Ontario, Canada, 1996–2001 // Diabetes Care. 2006. Vol. 29, N 2. P. 232–235. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.29.02.06.dc05-1482. Erratum in: Diabetes Care. 2006. Vol. 29, N 7. P. 1723. PMID: 16443865.

69. Wylie B.R., Kong J., Kozak S.E., Marshall C.J., Tong S.O., Thompson D.M. Normal perinatal mortality in type 1 diabetes mellitus in a series of 300 consecutive pregnancy outcomes // Am. J. Perinatol. 2002. Vol. 19, N 4. P. 169–176. DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-28499.

70. Boulot P., Chabbert-Buffet N., d’Ercole C., Floriot M., Fontaine P. et al. French multicentric survey of outcome of pregnancy in women with pregestational diabetes // Diabetes Care. 2003. Vol. 26, N 11. P. 2990–2993. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.11.2990.

71. Kjos S.L., Berkowitz K., Xiang A. Independent predictors of cesarean delivery in women with diabetes // J. Matern Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2004. Vol. 15, N 1. P. 61–67. DOI: 10.1080/14767050310001650743.

72. Miailhe G., Le Ray C., Timsit J., Lepercq J. Factors associated with urgent cesarean delivery in women with type 1 diabetes mellitus // Obstet. Gynecol. 2013. Vol. 121, N 5. P. 983–989. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828b6d97.

73. Conway D.L. Choosing route of delivery for the macrosomic infant of a diabetic mother: Cesarean section versus vaginal delivery // J. Matern Fetal. Neonatal. Med. 2002. Vol. 12, N 6. P. 442–448. DOI: 10.1080/jmf.12.6.442.448.

74. Doumouchtsis S.K., Arulkumaran S. Are all brachial plexus injuries caused by shoulder dystocia? // Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2009. Vol. 64, N 9. P. 615–623. DOI: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181b27a3a.

75. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 30, September 2001 (replaces Technical Bulletin Number 200, December 1994). Gestational diabetes // Obstet. Gynecol. 2001. Vol. 98, N 3. P. 525–538. Retraction in: Obstet Gynecol. 2013. Vol. 122, N 2. Pt. 1. P. 405. PMID: 11547793.

76. Rouse D.J., Owen J., Goldenberg R.L., Cliver S.P. The effectiveness and costs of elective cesarean delivery for fetal macrosomia diagnosed by ultrasound // JAMA. 1996. Vol. 276, N 18. P. 1480–1486. PMID: 8903259.

77. Alberico S., Businelli C., Wiesenfeld U., Erenbourg A., Maso G. et al. Gestational diabetes and fetal growth acceleration: induction of labour versus expectant management // Minerva Ginecol. 2010. Vol. 62, N 6. P. 533–539. PMID: 21079575.

78. Persson M., Pasupathy D., Hanson U., Westgren M., Norman M. Pre-pregnancy body mass index and the risk of adverse outcome in type 1 diabetic pregnancies: a population-based cohort study // BMJ Open. 2012. Vol. 2, N 1. P. e000601. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000601.

79. Simmons D. Diabetes and obesity in pregnancy // Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2011. Vol. 25, N 1. P. 25–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.10.006.

80. Vahratian A., Zhang J., Troendle J.F., Savitz D.A., Siega-Riz A.M. Maternal prepregnancy overweight and obesity and the pattern of labor progression in term nulliparous women // Obstet. Gynecol. 2004. Vol. 104, N 5. Pt. 1. P. 943–951. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000142713.53197.91.

81. Marchiano D., Elkousy M., Stevens E., Peipert J., Macones G. Diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus does not influence the success rates for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery // Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2004. Vol. 190, N 3. P. 790–796. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.068.

82. Cormier C.M., Landon M.B., Lai Y., Spong C.Y., Rouse D.J. et al. White’s classification of maternal diabetes and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery success in women undergoing a trial of labor // Obstet. Gynecol. 2010. Vol. 115, N 1. P. 60–64. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c534ca.

83. ACOG committee opinion N 560: Medically indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries // Obstet. Gynecol. 2013. Vol. 121, N 4. P. 908–910. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000428648.75548.00.

84. Caughey A.B., Valent A.M. When to Deliver Women with Diabetes in Pregnancy? // Am. J. Perinatol. 2016. Vol. 33, N 13. P. 1250–1254. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1585589.

85. Spong C.Y., Mercer B.M., D’Alton M., Kilpatrick S., Blackwell S., Saade G. Timing of indicated late-preterm and early-term birth // Obstet. Gynecol. 2011. Vol. 118, N 2. Pt. 1. P. 323–333. DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182255999.